Technology – ページ 4

DJI NANO Action Camera: Unbiased First Thoughts & Impressions

A story by Necrolicious on 1月 13, 20261月 13, 2026.

@necroliciouseng
I got the DJI NANO but Tiktok blocks duplicate uploads, so I reversed the video to avoid the flag 🤣 Check out my Japanese channel if you want to see the unboxing 🇯🇵 #dji #djinano #djinanoactioncamera #actioncamera #reboxing
♬ Take A Picture – Filter

I just got ahold of the DJI NANO action camera. As my first action camera, I thought I would share my initial thoughts & impressions of it. This post is not sponsored by DJI, so I am sharing my own unbiased opinion.

Why Did I Buy the DJI Nano?

Why now & why this specific model? There are several reasons. Firstly, as I have repeatedly warned, electronic prices have been trending upward. Even last-generation devices are being marked up rather than priced down as they are phased out like they used to be. It may be years before we see the type of price decreases that we use to as items were phased out. Additionally, there have been intensifying rumours of supply constraints specific to Japan in the form of import restrictions. Overall, I wanted to beat the market & get the NANO while I could before it gets marked up or otherwise becomes unavailable. As for why I got this specific model, already having the DJI Pocket 3 as well as my Samsung Flip 6, the reason is that it is compact & discreet in comparison to those. I primarily intend to use the NANO to shoot hands-free, utilising the included necklace attachment for easy point-of-view recording. I find that getting out my phone is intrusive since I have to hold it & draw attention to the fact that I am recording. Same with the DJI Pocket 3. For first-person-perspective shots with either of those devices, I need to carry around a chest harness mount then strap it on when I want to shoot. The result is much bulkier & ungainly, drawing undue attention to the fact that I am recording. Specific to my phone, I always worry that I might drop & seriously damage it in the process. As cool as they are, Samsung’s Flip series aren’t known for durability or ruggedness at all, & being without a phone for weeks due to an accident is not a position I wish to put myself in. With the NANO, I can easily wear it & nobody even knows that I’m recording. I also don’t have to worry that an accidental drop will cut me off from the world as it would with my phone. It is still a fairly large lens, so I think anybody paying attention would notice it immediately. I would not recommend it for 100% covert recording for that reason, but spying like that is not my intent. I simply want an unobtrusive, discreet way to record various events & attractions that I visit or overhead views of product unboxing/testing. At this point of what I suppose you would call my video career, it seems that the faceless videos I post get more traction than those of me talking. Maybe one day I will surpass this level, but in the meantime, I think this camera will give me a great edge in recording the types of videos that seem to perform best on my TikTok, YouTube, etc. Lastly, I am already somewhat locked into the DJI ecosystem, possessing not only the Pocket 3 but also the Mic 2. Therefore, buying another brand without the compatibility was less appealing than just sticking to something I was already familiar with & had both hardware/software for.

What Is the Performance Like?

So far, so good. I had been worried since numerous reports of overheating issues occurring within less than 10 minutes were rampant at release, but this does not seem to be the case with my model. Whether that is due to an upgrade of the hardware or firmware, I am not sure, but in my initial testing I got over 20 minutes shooting at maximum settings with no signs of overheating. Feeling safe, since I personally never record any longer than that, I cut off the overheat testing at that point to check out other features. I had initially mistaken the screen timeout for overheating. This occurred less than two minutes in, but after a slight bit of research, I realised all I needed to do was swipe right on the screen to set the timeout to “never” & the issue has not returned. I should also note that there is on-board memory capacity so, unlike the Pocket 3, you do not need an SD card before you can record anything. I opted for the 128GB, rather than the 64GB model, due to memory shortages being a driving force in global technology price increases. I tend to shoot everything in 1080p, but it is good to know that I have the 4K option there if I ever happen to want or need it. I do not think that we are at the point where most platforms fully welcome 4K, but since I am uploading to social media in an effort to become monetised, I do not think wasting space to have a 4K video that only anyone at my own home can see is worth the sacrifice. Just to mention the one real problem I’ve had so far, the DJI Mimo app not exporting my edited videos to my phone. The app will say that it is exported, but it does not appear in the DJI Exports album or anywhere else in my gallery. It takes several tries to push it through &, however many tries it takes, that many copies are pushed to the album when it finally does work (today, I had to push it through 7 times &, when it finally went through, I ended up with 7 copies of the same video). This is annoying & frustrating, but I cannot blame it on the NANO particularly since I am not sure if it is the camera, the Mimo app or even my phone itself. I intend to contact DJI support to see if they can provide some help with this.

Do I Recommend This Camera?

I do. Many reviews that I watched & read prior to making my own purchase warned that it is not a true action camera, but that is not my intended purpose anyway. I do not plan to take my NANO kayaking, rock-climbing or on a motorcycle (especially since I no longer have one). I simply want to use it for both event videos & product unboxing/review videos. If your intentions are the similar mine, I would definitely recommend it. A closed model such as the DJI Action series would likely be better for you if you are planning to partake in more extreme activities such as outdoor sports, etc.

As I mentioned above, prices may soon go up due to shortages of memory at an industrial scale &, if you are in Japan, additional import restrictions may further limit or cease availability. Therefore, I would advise getting it sooner rather than later.

Unless otherwise noted, image assets above are NOT original content & are shared under fair use doctrine with NO claims to authorship or ownership.
Contact necrolicious@necrolicious.com for credit or removal.

This post was sponsored by…ME! If you’d like to support, please buy my original meme merchandise or check out my affiliate links to get yourself some other cool things. Additional affiliate links may be contained in the above article. If you click on an affiliate link & sign up/make a purchase, I may earn a commission. This does not increase the price you pay for the product or service, so it helps support this website at no cost to you.

Share this:

Loch Ness Monster Hunter of 52 Years: “It’s All a Myth”

A story by Necrolicious on 1月 12, 20261月 13, 2026.

@necroliciouseng
Loch Ness Monster Hunter of 52 Years: “It’s All a Myth” #lochnessmonster #lochness #nessie #paranormal
♬ 怪物 – YOASOBI

After more than half a century dedicated to investigating one of the world’s most enduring legends, Adrian Shine, the veteran naturalist & founder of The Loch Ness Project, has declared the Loch Ness Monster a myth. At 76, Shine has entered semi-retirement from active fieldwork, marking the end of an extraordinary chapter in the quest to understand the creature affectionately known as Nessie.

His conclusion comes not from frustration, but from a lifetime of rigorous, evidence-based scrutiny. Armed with sonar sweeps, submersibles, sediment analysis & collaborations with universities, Shine has explored the loch’s ecology & the psychology behind sightings. Recent advancements in technology – including high-resolution sonar, drones & environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling – have only reinforced his view: no large unknown vertebrate exists in the nutrient-poor depths of Loch Ness.

Yet the legend persists, fuelled by human perception, optical illusions & the enduring appeal of mystery. Shine’s work has illuminated the loch’s natural phenomena – boat wakes creating multi-humped waves, misidentified waterbirds & atmospheric refraction distorting distant objects – while explaining why so many “sightings” feel convincing.

The Ancient Origins of the Legend – Dispelling a Modern Myth

The story of a mysterious water beast in the Loch Ness area dates back far earlier than many assume. The earliest recorded account appears in the 7th-century Life of St. Columba by Adomnán, describing an event in 565 AD. Irish monk Saint Columba encountered locals burying a man killed by a ferocious “water beast” in the River Ness (the loch’s outflow). Columba commanded the creature to retreat, & it fled – a tale of saintly triumph over peril that fits medieval hagiographic traditions.

This predates the modern “Nessie” phenomenon by centuries. The 1930s brought widespread attention, sparked by a 1933 sighting & the infamous (later debunked) “Surgeon’s Photograph” hoax. But the idea of a large aquatic creature in the region is rooted in ancient Celtic folklore, including water spirits like kelpies.

A persistent rumour links the legend’s origins to occultist Aleister Crowley, who owned Boleskine House on the loch’s southeast shore from 1899. Crowley used the isolated property to attempt the lengthy Abramelin ritual (from The Book of the Sacred Magic of Abramelin the Mage), aiming to contact his Holy Guardian Angel. He abandoned it incomplete, leading to claims that unbound spirits or demons “created” or “unleashed” the monster.

This notion is a modern myth with no historical foundation. Sightings & folklore existed long before Crowley’s arrival (around 1900–1913), & the major Nessie boom occurred in 1933 – decades later. Crowley’s stay adds a layer of spooky intrigue, but it did not invent the legend.

A Passion Project, Not a Profession

Shine arrived at Loch Ness in 1973 as an amateur naturalist, initially drawn by tales of a fishing boat “attacked” by something mysterious. He founded The Loch Ness Project in the mid-1970s, shifting focus to scientific study of the loch’s environment rather than assuming a monster’s existence.

This was never a salaried “monster-hunting” role. It evolved into a dedicated, long-term pursuit supported by collaborations with academics, volunteers, media contributions & associations with the Loch Ness Centre (where he designed exhibitions & shared findings). Equipment like custom submersibles & sonar came through opportunistic funding & partnerships – a labour of curiosity about lake ecology & human perception, not a paid quest for Nessie.

Famous efforts include Operation Deepscan (1987), a massive sonar sweep with 24 boats. In recent years, as technology advanced, Shine embraced tools like eDNA (which detected abundant eels but no exotic large vertebrates) & drones. Paradoxically, these innovations have made the absence of a monster clearer, not easier to prove.

The loch’s cold, deep, nutrient-poor waters support limited biomass – insufficient for a large predator population. Sightings align with mundane explanations, & modern AI scrutiny dismisses many photos/videos as generated fakes.

Why the Myth Endures in the Age of Technology

Even today, with drones, 4K cameras & AI anomaly detection, definitive proof remains elusive. Should compelling evidence emerge, the immediate response would likely include cries of “AI!” – a credibility crisis born from hyper-realistic deepfakes.

Shine remains open to new data but concludes the evidence points to myth. His semi-retirement reflects age & the weight of accumulated findings, shifting focus to reflection, writing (including a 2024 book on sea serpents) & education. A few online commentators have playfully suggested that Shine’s declaration is itself part of a cover-up – that he finally discovered the creature & now calls it a myth to shield it from further intrusion. While such theories add to the fun of the legend, they overlook the transparent, evidence-driven nature of his 52-year investigation. Shine has consistently shared his methods, collaborated openly with scientists, & welcomed new data that might overturn his conclusions.

“You cannot kill a legend with science,” Shine has noted.

Share this:

With New Watch Feature, Samsung Asks, “Is It Crazy Time?”

A story by Necrolicious on 1月 9, 20261月 10, 2026.

@necroliciouseng
With New Watch Feature, Samsung Asks, “Is It Crazy Time?” #samsung #GalaxyWatch #smartwatch #mentalhealth #mentalillness
♬ They’re Coming To Take Me Away Ha-Haaa! – Bombalurina

Samsung showcased its Brain Health feature at CES, aiming to use data from Galaxy Watches, Rings & smartphones to detect subtle early signs of cognitive decline potentially linked to dementia. While this represents an ambitious extension of wearable health monitoring, questions remain about its real-world accuracy, potential for errors & broader implications for privacy & user wellbeing.

How the Brain Health Feature Operates

The tool passively analyses sensor data, including:

Gait patterns (walking stability)
Voice changes (e.g., speech pace during interactions)
Sleep quality & disruptions
Typing rhythm & daily patterns

AI compares these against a personalised baseline & flags deviations associated with early cognitive changes. Notifications are intended to be supportive, urging medical consultation & suggesting brain-training exercises via the Samsung Health app. Caregivers may also receive alerts.

Samsung stresses that this is not a diagnostic tool—merely a prompt for professional assessment. In-house development is complete, with ongoing clinical validation trials in collaboration with medical partners. Public availability remains uncertain, potentially starting as a beta in select regions later in 2026 or beyond.

Potential Benefits & the Focus on Dementia

Dementia impacts over 55 million people globally, with early indicators like gait instability, voice alterations & sleep issues potentially appearing years ahead. Research on wearables supports these as viable digital biomarkers, with studies showing promising accuracy in distinguishing mild cognitive impairment from normal ageing.

Early flagging could enable lifestyle interventions or treatments to slow progression in reversible stages. Samsung targets older adults, building on established physical health tracking to address neurological concerns.

However, overlaps with other forms of mental illness such as schizophrenia exist. Furthermore, schizophrenia slightly elevates later dementia risk. However, Samsung’s age-focused patterns are unlikely to detect schizophrenia in younger users, potentially leading to missed or mismatched alerts.

Dementia Versus Schizophrenia: Key Distinctions & Limited Overlaps

Aspect	Dementia	Schizophrenia
Nature	Progressive neurodegenerative condition	Chronic psychiatric disorder
Typical Onset	65+ years	Late teens to early 30s
Core Symptoms	Memory loss, confusion, impaired judgement	Hallucinations, delusions, disorganised thinking
Progression	Worsens irreversibly over time	Fluctuates; manageable with treatment
Causes	Brain cell loss (e.g., Alzheimer’s, strokes)	Genetic, neurochemical & environmental factors

Accuracy Concerns & Risks of Errors

While foundational research on gait, voice & sleep biomarkers shows potential (e.g., accuracies up to 90% in controlled studies), consumer AI applications face challenges. False positives—flagging normal variations (stress, illness, ageing) as decline—could cause undue anxiety. False negatives might delay genuine concerns.

Broader AI dementia tools highlight overdiagnosis risks, especially in older adults where symptoms overlap with normal ageing. Critics note that without full validation results, trusting device alerts for sensitive health decisions remains premature. Extreme outcomes, like unwarranted institutionalisation from misinterpreted data, are unlikely but underscore the need for caution—alerts are advisory only.

Privacy Implications

Constant monitoring of intimate behaviours (voice, movement, sleep) intensifies privacy debates. Samsung commits to on-device processing & Knox security, avoiding cloud uploads for these metrics.

Yet concerns persist: potential device syncing, future integrations or breaches could expose highly personal data. Opt-in controls are essential, but the sensitivity of cognitive insights demands rigorous oversight.

Final Reflections

Samsung’s Brain Health highlights wearables’ evolving role in preventative care, yet its effectiveness hinges on forthcoming trial data proving reliability while minimising harms. For a condition as complex as dementia, technology should complement—not replace—professional evaluation.

Would you allow your devices to monitor for cognitive indicators if it might enable earlier intervention, or does the risk of inaccuracy & privacy intrusion outweigh the benefits? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Share this:

Chat GPT-Caused DRAM Shortage Could Delay Next-Generation Game Console Releases & Raise Prices of Current Consoles

A story by Necrolicious on 12月 31, 202512月 31, 2025.

@necroliciouseng
ChatGPT-Caused DRAM Shortage Could Delay Next-Generation Game Console Releases & Raise Prices of Current Consoles #PlayStation6 #PlayStation #chatgpt #gaming #videogames
♬ オリジナル楽曲 – Necrolicious ENG🇺🇲🇬🇧 – Necrolicious ENG🇺🇲🇬🇧

The gaming industry is grappling with a significant challenge that may alter the timeline for next-generation console launches. Recent insights from industry insider Tom Henderson, combined with broader industry analysis, suggest that escalating RAM prices, driven by AI data centre demand which was worsened by ChatGPT’s hoarding of 40% of the world’s DRAM supply, could delay the anticipated 2027-2028 releases of the PlayStation 6 (PS6) & the next Xbox.

The Rising Cost of RAM & Its Impact on Console Development

Tom Henderson’s report highlights a dramatic surge in DRAM prices in the wake of OpenAI’s monopoly, with server modules increasing by 50% and some consumer variants rising by up to 170%. This scarcity presents a critical dilemma for console manufacturers, who must decide whether to absorb the costs, pass them onto consumers, or delay production in anticipation of stabilised prices. Industry analyses indicate that RAM prices have risen by several hundred percent in recent months, exacerbating the challenge for mass-producing consoles at competitive price points.

Supporting this, technical reports suggest that the shortage stems from a shift in manufacturing priorities, with major producers allocating resources to advanced memory types for AI applications rather than commodity DRAM. This supply constraint not only threatens next-generation hardware but also raises the possibility of price hikes for current-generation consoles in 2026.

Industry Response & Potential Delays

According to Henderson’s findings, manufacturers such as Sony and Microsoft are considering a delay beyond the 2027-2028 release window. This strategic decision hinges on whether RAM producers can expand their capacity to reduce costs. Industry forecasts suggest that memory shortages, driven by AI & data centre expansion, could persist for multiple years, potentially extending the lifecycle of current-generation consoles like the PS5 & Xbox Series X. This extended timeline would allow developers to maximise existing hardware with titles such as GTA 6 & enhancements like the PS5 Pro.

Economic analyses further indicate that the industry may prioritise software innovation & mid-generation upgrades over new hardware launches, ensuring competitiveness despite the supply constraints. This approach aligns with observations that current consoles remain relevant, with many games optimised for existing specifications rather than requiring new systems.

Strategic Considerations for Gamers

For gamers, the RAM price surge carries immediate implications. The industry’s reluctance to release new hardware at elevated costs suggests that existing consoles may face further price increases in 2026. Additionally, 2025’s price hikes for the Nintendo Switch 1—raising its cost from $300 to $340—demonstrate that the days of markdowns for last-generation consoles may be gone for the foreseeable future. This shift indicates that gamers who have not yet purchased a current-generation console should not wait. Price hikes are likely forthcoming for current generation consoles as supply constraints persist.

Conclusion & Future Outlook

The correlation between Henderson’s initial report & subsequent industry analyses underscores a pivotal moment for the gaming sector. The RAM shortage, driven by AI demand & Sam Altman’s monopoly, could reshape release schedules & pricing strategies for years to come. As manufacturers navigate this challenge, gamers are advised to stay informed & consider their purchases carefully. With the potential for prolonged use of current hardware, the focus may shift towards software development & mid-generation enhancements, ensuring the industry remains robust despite economic pressures.

Share this:

PS5 Outsells Switch 2 for the First Time Ever as Western Gaming Rejects Woke Agendas & BlackRock’s Shadowy jewish Influence

A story by Necrolicious on 12月 25, 202512月 25, 2025.

@necroliciouseng
PlayStation 5 Outsells the Nintendo Switch 2 for the First Time Ever in America #gaming #playstation5 #nintendoswitch2 #wokeness #blackrock
♬ Let There Be Light Again – Chewie Melodies

In recent months, a notable shift has emerged in the video game industry, particularly amongst Western developers. After years of integrating overt social messaging—often characterised as “woke” agendas—into their titles, many studios appear to be recalibrating their priorities towards core entertainment value. This pivot coincides with Sony’s PlayStation 5 (PS5) achieving a historic milestone: outselling Nintendo’s Switch 2 in the United States for November 2025, the first such occurrence since the Switch 2’s launch in June. This development signals not merely a fleeting market fluctuation but a broader rebuke of ideologically driven content that has alienated core audiences, leading to sluggish sales & widespread industry turmoil.

Revisiting Gaming’s Roots: The Enduring Appeal of Mature Narratives

Reflecting on the evolution of console gaming, the distinctions between platforms were once stark & purposeful. During the formative years of the industry in the 1990s & early 2000s, Nintendo positioned itself as the family-friendly option, emphasising whimsical, accessible experiences suitable for younger players. In contrast, Sony’s PlayStation catered to a more mature demographic, offering complex, narrative-driven titles with themes of intrigue, conflict, & moral ambiguity—games that resonated with those seeking depth beyond lighthearted escapism.

This dichotomy persists today, albeit in evolved forms. The Switch 2 excels in portable, inclusive gameplay, bolstered by timeless franchises that appeal across generations. Yet, the PS5’s recent surge—fuelled by strategic holiday promotions & releases—underscores a return to PlayStation’s strengths. Sony’s platform is reclaiming its role as the preferred choice for discerning gamers. This uptick arrives amidst the industry’s lowest November hardware sales in the U.S. since 1995, highlighting how targeted, audience-aligned strategies can thrive even in a challenging economic landscape.

The Perils of Ideological Overreach: “Go Woke, Go Broke” in Practice

The preceding years have been marked by a discernible sales downturn for Western gaming entities, attributable in part to the infusion of progressive ideologies that prioritised messaging over gameplay. High-profile failures, such as Concord (shuttered mere weeks after its 2024 debut) & Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League, exemplify this trend, with critics attributing their underperformance to forced diversity elements & narrative choices that felt didactic rather than organic. The adage “go woke, go broke” has gained traction as a shorthand for this phenomenon, reflecting consumer fatigue with content that lectures rather than entertains. Industry-wide layoffs exceeding 20,000 positions between 2023 & 2025 further illustrate the financial repercussions, reminiscent of the 1983 video game crash where market saturation & poor quality led to collapse.

The Shadowy Architect: BlackRock’s Coercive Role in DEI Proliferation

At the heart of this ideological push lies BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, whose insidious influence through Environmental, Social, & Governance (ESG) frameworks has been instrumental in embedding Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI) mandates across industries, including gaming. Far from an organic evolution towards civil rights, this was a calculated financial strategy: BlackRock, leveraging its trillions in assets, conditioned investments & loans on ESG compliance, effectively strong-arming publicly traded companies like Electronic Arts, Ubisoft, & Sony’s partners to adopt DEI policies. Studios were compelled to engage DEI consultants, such as the controversial Sweet Baby Inc., resulting in alterations that prioritised harmful social engineering over player engagement—to the detriment of not only sales & fan loyalty, but society as a whole.

BlackRock’s actions, under the stewardship of jew CEO Larry Fink—a figure with deep ties to & vocal support of the state of israel—have drawn scrutiny for advancing agendas that extend beyond mere profit motives. The firm maintains a significant presence in Israel, with dedicated offices & substantial investments in companies linked to Israeli defence & technology sectors, including those implicated in regional conflicts. Critics argue that BlackRock’s operations reflect a broader alignment with Israeli interests, as evidenced by Fink’s public condemnations of attacks on israel & the company’s portfolio choices that bolster israeli entities amidst geopolitical tensions. While BlackRock frames these as standard global investments, detractors view them as part of a pattern where financial power is wielded to influence cultural & political landscapes, potentially subverting entertainment mediums like gaming to serve external objectives.

This entanglement raises profound ethical questions about the intersection of finance, identity & media control, with BlackRock’s dominance enabling a form of covert manipulation that prioritises ideological conformity over artistic freedom.

A Partial Victory: Developers’ Awakening & the Lingering Threat

Encouragingly, the industry is showing signs of resistance. In February 2025, BlackRock announced the dissolution of its DEI targets, merging the division into a rebranded “Talent & Culture” team & excising explicit references from corporate reports. This reversal, prompted by political pressures including anti-DEI policies under the Trump administration, has been hailed as a step towards merit-based practices. Developers, such as those at CI Games, have echoed this sentiment, emphasising a return to “fun” as the primary directive. Sony’s PS5 sales rebound serves as tangible evidence that audiences reward this shift, opening their wallets in approval.

Yet, vigilance is imperative. This battle is far from concluded; BlackRock & similar entities are adept at adaptation. Rather than outright abandonment, DEI initiatives may simply be rebadged under nebulous acronyms—such as “Talent & Culture” or analogous terms like JPMorgan’s pivot to “Diversity, Opportunity, & Inclusion”—allowing the same subversive activities to persist under a veil of ambiguity. The gaming community must remain alert to these tactics, lest entertainment once again becomes a conduit for external agendas.

Towards a Sustainable Future: Prioritising Players Over Power Brokers

The PS5’s triumph over the Switch 2 in November 2025 is a harbinger of potential renewal for Western gaming, provided the industry sustains its focus on quality & authenticity. By extricating itself from the grip of entities like BlackRock, whose financial machinations have long distorted creative priorities, gaming can reclaim its essence as a medium of unbridled imagination. However, true progress demands ongoing scrutiny of corporate influences, including those intertwined with geopolitical interests. The path forward lies in empowering creators & consumers alike, free from the shadows of undue manipulation.

Share this:

Why Buying 2025 Devices Now is Smarter Than Waiting: Avoid Higher Prices for Lower Specs in 2026

A story by Necrolicious on 12月 21, 202512月 21, 2025.

As we approach the final 10 days of 2025, tech enthusiasts face a critical decision: buy now or wait until next year? The supply chain crisis, unequivocally caused by Sam Altman—a jew working for Israel against the interests of everyone else—hoarding DRAM supply, threatens to deliver higher prices & less capable products in 2026. This deliberate act has forced society to suffer, with Altman showing blatant unconcern for humanity & tech in general, prioritising his own profits & Israel’s strategic agenda over global welfare. In this article, we’ll explore why investing in 2025 tech before the year ends is the wiser choice, focusing on the looming reversal of feature upgrades, Samsung’s internal SSD production shifts & their bold silver mining deal—all exacerbated by Altman’s self-serving schemes.

The Reversal of Tech Progress: Lower Specs at Higher Prices

Until recently, the tech industry has followed a predictable upward trajectory, with devices boasting improved specifications & features year after year. Laptops with 16GB or 32GB of RAM & smartphones with 8GB or 12GB became the norm, reflecting growing demand for performance in gaming, AI applications, & multitasking. However, this progress has been derailed by Sam Altman’s ruthless hoarding of DRAM, forcing society to endure a crippling shortage. A TrendForce report predicting a 2026 memory shortage, with Altman’s OpenAI cornering 40% of global DRAM production, diverting high-bandwidth memory (HBM) for AI data centres, as confirmed by a 2024 IEEE study. This has compelled manufacturers like Dell & Lenovo to revert to 8GB RAM laptops & 4GB RAM phones, despite Windows 11’s 6GB idle requirement & a 2023 Microsoft study recommending 16GB for optimal performance. Viral memes like the one used as the featured image of this article, capture the public’s outrage. Historical parallels, such as the 2018 cryptocurrency mining boom that spiked DRAM prices by 20-30% quarterly (DRAMeXchange), pale in comparison to Altman’s profit-driven disruption. Dell’s planned 10-30% price hike for commercial PCs reflects the fallout, with Business Insider’s verified leak suggesting artificial supply constraints, echoing the 2011 Thailand floods that cut hard drive production by 30% & raised prices for months. Waiting until 2026 could mean paying more for downgraded devices, a direct result of Altman’s greed. Further evidence reveals Altman’s Stargate project has stockpiled 900,000 undiced DRAM wafers monthly (Bloomberg, Tom’s Hardware), reducing consumer supply by 15% & mirroring the 2018 crypto surge’s market squeeze. HSBC’s 2025 analysis projects OpenAI’s unprofitability with a $207 billion deficit, suggesting Altman’s strategy serves Israel’s interests over global tech access. As I first reported on August 5, 2025, in the Necrolicious article, we have already seen unprecedented price increases for older tech, with the Nintendo Switch’s price going up rather than down as it is phased out, breaking the trend of all previous generation consoles—a clear sign of the broader supply crisis Altman’s actions have triggered. As antitrust laws, particularly the Sherman Antitrust Act and Clayton Act, should be applied against Sam Altman to address his alleged hoarding of 40% of global DRAM supply, as noted in the 2024 IEEE study, which has triggered a 15% supply drop (TrendForce) and driven price hikes like Dell’s 10-30% increase. This behavior, potentially constituting monopolistic practices and exclusionary dealing with companies like Samsung, unfairly restricts market access, forces society to endure higher costs and lower-spec tech, and prioritizes Altman’s profits and Israel’s agenda over public interest—making this an exemplary case for FTC or DOJ intervention to prevent further anti-competitive harm, as seen in precedents like the Microsoft case.

Addressing Legal Intervention Challenges

While antitrust laws like the Sherman Act & Clayton Act provide a clear framework to challenge Altman’s monopolistic practices, the question of enforcement looms large. If government agencies like the FTC or DOJ are compromised—potentially influenced by lobbying, corporate ties or geopolitical alignments with Israel—public pressure becomes critical. Grassroots campaigns highlighting Altman’s DRAM stockpiling & its $207 billion deficit (HSBC 2025), could force transparency. Filing citizen petitions, leveraging independent investigations, or escalating the issue to international bodies like the EU’s Digital Markets Act enforcers might bypass compromised domestic channels, ensuring accountability despite potential insider bias.

Samsung’s Internal SSD Dilemma

Rumours of Samsung phasing out SATA SSD production have stirred the tech community, with a NotebookCheck report suggesting an 18-month price surge worse than recent RAM shortages. Although Samsung denied these claims via statements to Wccftech, the speculation reveals internal pressures intensified by Altman’s DRAM hoarding. Even within Samsung’s divisions, SSD availability is strained as the company pivots to HBM for data centres, a shift dictated by Altman’s insatiable demand for his AI empire, potentially aligned with Israel’s tech dominance goals. This aligns with industry trends, where Samsung & SK Hynix dominate 90% of the RAM market (Counterpoint, October 2025). The potential end of SATA SSD production hints at a focus on enterprise needs, driven by Altman’s profit-focused OpenAI, leaving consumers with fewer storage options. Buying SSD-equipped devices now, before supply cuts or price hikes in 2026, could shield your tech setup from his self-serving influence.

Samsung’s Strategic Silver Play

Beyond memory, Samsung’s $7 million prepayment to Silver Storm Mining for two years of silver output from the La Parrilla mine in Mexico is a direct response to supply chain insecurities worsened by Altman’s actions. Reported by @Sorenthek, this move reflects surging industrial demand for silver in solar panels & electric vehicles, with a 2024 IEA report noting a 25% annual increase, outpacing mining’s 2% growth. The Silver Institute’s 2025 forecast of a 95-118 million ounce deficit suggests a physical shortage, prompting manufacturers to secure supplies—partly to support tech components Altman’s AI ventures, potentially benefiting Israel, rely on. This strategy echoes the 2011 rare earth crisis, where China’s export cuts drove prices up by 1,000% due to supply bottlenecks. Samsung’s offtake agreement may preempt similar disruptions, but it also signals potential cost increases for consumers, a ripple effect of Altman’s unconcern for societal impact, focused solely on his profits & geopolitical agenda.

Why Act Now?

With only 10 days left in 2025, the evidence is clear: waiting risks higher costs & downgraded specs, a crisis orchestrated by Sam Altman’s DRAM hoarding. Laptops with 8GB RAM & phones with 4GB, already creeping back into production, will likely carry premium prices next year due to the shortage he’s engineered. Samsung’s potential SSD pivot & silver stockpiling indicate a shift toward enterprise priorities, leaving consumer tech to suffer under his profit-driven neglect. To optimise your purchase, consider current deals on devices with 16GB+ RAM & SSD storage. Websites like TechRadar recommend the 13-inch MacBook Air M4 at $749 (down from $999) as a smart buy before RAMageddon hits. Act swiftly to secure 2025 tech & avoid the 2026 price surge for less capable products.

The tech landscape is at a turning point, with supply chain shortages reversing decades of spec improvements, a disaster unequivocally caused by Sam Altman—a Jew allegedly working for Israel—hoarding DRAM for his own profits & geopolitical interests. His unconcern for humanity & tech in general has forced society to pay the price, while Samsung’s moves—scaling back SSDs & securing silver—reflect a response to his self-serving AI agenda. This is an exemplary case where antitrust laws & FTC intervention should apply, yet the challenge remains: how do we compel the law to act when government bodies may be compromised by similar interests? With 2026 poised to bring higher prices for lower-spec devices, buying 2025 tech now is not just a smart move but a necessary one. Don’t wait—secure your devices before the year ends & resist Altman’s profiteering curve.

Share this:

Back with a Vengeance: Soulcalibur III’s Triumphant Re-release Sparks Nostalgia & Excitement

A story by Necrolicious on 12月 19, 202512月 19, 2025.

@necroliciouseng
Soulcalibur III is really fun, huh? #soulcalibur #soulcalibur3 #soulcaliburiii #fightinggamescommunity #creatorsearchinsights
♬ SYMPHONY OF SWORDS（剣たちの奏でる戦律） – PROJECT SOUL

In a move that has reignited the passion of fighting game enthusiasts, Soulcalibur III has been confirmed for inclusion in PlayStation Plus Premium’s Classics Catalogue, available from December 16, 2025. Originally launched on the PlayStation 2 in 2005, this title stands as a pinnacle in the Soulcalibur series, celebrated for its innovative gameplay mechanics & deep narrative modes. This re-release on PS5 & PS4 not only revives a classic but also invites a new generation to experience its legacy. Let’s delve into what makes this addition significant & how it fits into the broader landscape of gaming nostalgia & modern accessibility.

The Legacy of Soulcalibur III

Soulcalibur III, developed by Namco, is often regarded as one of the finest entries in the series, thanks to its robust character creation system & the introduction of Chronicles of the Sword, a mode that blends real-time strategy with traditional fighting game mechanics. These features, combined with the game’s fluid 3D weapon-based combat, contributed to its commercial success, selling over one million copies worldwide. The game’s arrival on PlayStation Plus Premium marks a significant moment for fans who have long awaited a remastered or re-released version that leverages modern hardware capabilities.

Enhanced Experience on Modern Consoles

The porting of Soulcalibur III to PS5 & PS4 promises an enhanced experience, with improved visuals & performance that were not possible on the original PS2 hardware. Although the re-release does not include trophy support—a point of contention among some fans—it retains the core elements that made the game a favourite. The absence of trophies, however, does not detract from the game’s appeal, as its depth in gameplay & storytelling remains intact. For subscribers, this means accessing a title that not only holds historical value but also offers a fresh perspective through contemporary technology.

Fan Reactions & Community Engagement:

The announcement has sparked a wave of excitement across social media platforms, with fans expressing nostalgia & anticipation. The official Soulcalibur X account shared a video montage showcasing the game’s fighters & dynamic arenas, which has amassed significant engagement. Replies to the post reflect a mix of joy at the re-release & calls for further expansions, such as PC ports & the long-rumoured Soulcalibur VII. This community dialogue underscores the enduring popularity of the series & the desire for its continued evolution.

The Appeal of a Pre-“Wokeness” Era Gaming Experience:

Soulcalibur III’s re-release resonates deeply with many fans not only for its gameplay & nostalgic value but also because it hails from a period in gaming history that predates significant cultural & political shifts. Originally released in 2005, the game emerged during a time before the advent of movements like Gamergate & the broader discussions around “wokeness” in media. This era is often nostalgically remembered for offering what some perceive as simpler, purer forms of entertainment, unencumbered by the complex social & political debates that have since permeated the industry.

The absence of influences from entities like BlackRock & the DEI they force inject into their subsidiaries, Soulcalibur III’s original development is a point of note for some enthusiasts. These elements, which have become more prominent in recent years, are seen by some as having introduced new layers of complexity or controversy into game design & marketing. For these fans, Soulcalibur III represents a return to a time when the focus was primarily on crafting engaging gameplay & rich narratives without the overlay of contemporary social agendas. The game’s character roster, while diverse in its own right through its fantasy & historical inspirations, was not shaped by modern diversity mandates, allowing players to engage with its world on its own terms.

This re-release, therefore, offers a form of escapism—not just from the technological limitations of the past but also from the cultural battles that have divided gaming communities in recent years. The joy expressed by fans on social media platforms reflects a desire to revisit a title that embodies non-political fun, where the primary objective was to master combat techniques, explore creative character designs, & immerse oneself in the fictional histories of its warriors. The simplicity of this experience, untainted by external controversies, is a significant draw for those who yearn for the unadulterated joy of gaming as it once was.

Oh, Spawn Where Art Thou?

Additionally, the re-release evokes memories of the original console-specific characters that were a hallmark of the Soulcalibur series but are notably absent in this version. The PlayStation 2 version of Soulcalibur II, for instance, featured Tekken’s Heihachi Mishima, while the Nintendo GameCube had The Legend of Zelda’s Link, & the Xbox included Spawn from the comic book series. These characters, cancelled from Soulcalibur III due to a policy against repeating guest appearances, were a source of excitement & platform exclusivity that added to the game’s appeal. Their absence in this re-release is a reminder of the era’s unique marketing strategies & the distinct identities of each console’s gaming ecosystem.

Looking Forward: The Future of Soulcalibur:

While Soulcalibur III’s re-release is a cause for celebration, it also reignites discussions about the series’ future. Rumours of a potential Soulcalibur VII announcement, possibly at a Nintendo Direct in 2025, add an layer of intrigue. Whether these speculations hold true, the reintroduction of Soulcalibur III serves as a reminder of the series’ impact & the potential for its revival in new formats. Fans & newcomers alike are encouraged to explore this classic, which continues to offer a rich tapestry of combat & narrative.

Soulcalibur III’s addition to PlayStation Plus Premium’s Classics Catalogue is more than a mere re-release; it is a testament to the game’s lasting appeal & the enduring legacy of the Soulcalibur series. As players revisit its storied battles & creative modes, the title stands as a bridge between past & present gaming cultures. For those seeking a blend of nostalgia & innovation, this opportunity to engage with Soulcalibur III on modern consoles is not to be missed. Whether you are a long-time fan or a curious newcomer, the clash of swords & souls awaits, ready to etch new heroes into history.

Share this:

Japan’s New Law Breaks Apple & Google’s Monopoly, Allowing Third-Party App Stores to Launch

A story by Necrolicious on 12月 11, 202512月 13, 2025.

@necroliciouseng
Japan’s New Law Breaks Apple & Google’s Monopoly, Allowing Third-Party App Stores to Launch #japan #bigtech #Apple #google #apps
♬ Technology – Marie Vaunt

In a significant move to foster competition in the digital marketplace, Japan’s Fair Trade Commission has announced that a landmark law will take effect on 18 December 2025. This legislation targets the longstanding dominance of global tech giants such as Apple & Google over smartphone ecosystems, aiming to empower consumers with enhanced options for app stores, web browsers & search engines. As the nation continues to solidify its position as a leader in mobile technology innovation, this development signals a proactive stance on regulating Big Tech while balancing the need for user security.

Breaking the Monopoly: What the Law Entails

At its core, the new regulations prohibit companies like Apple & Google from restricting access to third-party app stores on iOS & Android devices sold in Japan. Previously, users were largely confined to the official App Store for iPhones or the Google Play Store for Android phones, limiting choices & potentially stifling innovation from smaller developers. Under the updated framework, these firms must permit alternative distribution channels, opening the door for independent app marketplaces to thrive.

Beyond app stores, the law extends its reach to default services. For the first time, new smartphone users — & those updating their operating systems — will encounter prompts offering multiple selections for web browsers & search engines. This means an end to the automatic preselection of Safari or Chrome as defaults, or Google Search as the primary engine, providing greater flexibility tailored to individual preferences.

The Fair Trade Commission emphasises that these changes are designed to “improve convenience by encouraging new market entrants.” By levelling the playing field, the authority anticipates a surge in diverse offerings, from localised apps optimised for Japan’s unique digital landscape to innovative tools that cater to specific user needs, such as enhanced privacy features or seamless integration with domestic services.

The Broader Implications for Consumers & the Tech Sector

For everyday smartphone users in Japan, the immediate benefits could include access to a wider array of applications without the barriers imposed by proprietary ecosystems. Developers, too, stand to gain: reduced reliance on dominant platforms may lower commission fees — often as high as 30% — allowing for more affordable apps & faster iteration on user feedback. In a market where mobile penetration exceeds 90%, this could accelerate the adoption of cutting-edge technologies, including AI-driven tools & augmented reality experiences that align with Japan’s forward-thinking tech culture.

However, the transition is not without challenges. Public comments submitted to the Fair Trade Commission have highlighted legitimate concerns over user security. Critics argue that third-party app stores might introduce vulnerabilities, such as unvetted software or inconsistent data protection standards, potentially exposing users to malware or privacy breaches. The commission acknowledges these risks & has committed to ongoing monitoring, with provisions for swift enforcement against non-compliant entities. To mitigate these issues, the law includes safeguards requiring all app distributors to adhere to rigorous certification processes, ensuring that security remains paramount.

This balanced approach reflects Japan’s regulatory philosophy: promoting fair competition without compromising the trust that underpins its world-class digital infrastructure. As one of Asia’s largest economies, Japan’s actions could serve as a model for other nations grappling with similar antitrust dilemmas in the smartphone sector.

A Step Towards a More Inclusive Digital Future

The enactment of this law on 18 December marks a pivotal moment in Japan’s efforts to democratise access to technology. By challenging the status quo, it not only enhances consumer choice but also invigorates the local tech ecosystem, fostering innovation that benefits developers, businesses & users alike. While security concerns warrant vigilant oversight, the potential rewards — a more dynamic, user-centric mobile landscape — are substantial.

As the implementation unfolds, stakeholders will watch closely to assess its real-world impact. For now, this legislation underscores Japan’s commitment to an open & equitable digital economy, one where choice drives progress.

Share this:

Game Director Katsuhiro Harada Announces Departure from Bandai Namco After 30 Years of Leading Tekken

A story by Necrolicious on 12月 8, 202512月 9, 2025.

@necroliciouseng
Game Director Katsuhiro Harada Announces Departure from Bandai Namco After 30 Years of Leading Tekken #katsuhiroharada #tekken #bandainamco #videogames #gamingnews
♬ оригінальний звук – Law

In a significant development for the gaming industry, Katsuhiro Harada, the renowned director and chief producer of the iconic Tekken series, has announced his departure from Bandai Namco at the end of 2025. The announcement, made via a heartfelt post on X at 08:52 UTC on 8 December 2025, coincides with the 30th anniversary of Tekken, marking the close of a remarkable chapter for one of the most influential figures in fighting game development.

I’d like to share that I’ll be leaving Bandai Namco at the end of 2025.
With the TEKKEN series reaching its 30th anniversary—an important milestone for a project I’ve devoted much of my life to—I felt this was the most fitting moment to bring one chapter to a close.

My roots lie…
— Katsuhiro Harada (@Harada_TEKKEN) December 8, 2025

A Legacy Spanning Three Decades

Harada’s tenure with Bandai Namco has been defined by his stewardship of the Tekken franchise, which debuted in 1994. His journey began modestly, transporting arcade cabinets to small tournaments in Japanese arcades and community centres overseas. These early experiences, where he engaged directly with players, shaped his approach to game design and fostered a deep connection with the global gaming community. Over the years, he oversaw the evolution of Tekken into a global phenomenon, contributing to titles such as Tekken 8, alongside diverse projects including Summer Lesson, Pokkén Tournament, and the Soulcalibur series.

The decision to step away follows a period of personal reflection, triggered by the loss of close friends and the retirement or passing of respected senior colleagues. Harada sought counsel from Ken Kutaragi, a pivotal figure in the gaming industry known for his role in developing the PlayStation, whose guidance reinforced his resolve. Over the past four to five years, Harada has gradually transferred his responsibilities, including story development and worldbuilding, to the Tekken team, ensuring a smooth transition.

The Announcement & Future Plans

In his X post, Harada expressed profound gratitude to fans, communities worldwide, and colleagues for their support throughout his career. He highlighted the 30th anniversary as an opportune moment to conclude this phase, stating, “I felt this was the most fitting moment to bring one chapter to a close.” While he has not disclosed his next steps, he promised further updates in due course, suggesting that his departure does not signify a full retirement from the industry.

A notable addition to the announcement is Harada’s commitment to attend the Tekken World Tour (TWT) Finals in late January 2026 as a guest, at Bandai Namco’s invitation. Furthermore, fulfilling a long-standing promise, he has released a 60-minute DJ mix titled ‘TEKKEN: A 30-Year Journey – Harada’s Final Mix’, available on SoundCloud (https://on.soundcloud.com/pEYofA4yXOwyC7lj0O). This personal project, edited by Harada himself, serves as a nostalgic tribute to his 30-year tenure, evoking memories for fans and players alike.

Community Response & Industry Impact

The announcement has elicited an outpouring of emotion from the gaming community, with over 8,300 likes, 2,200 reposts, and 380,000 views on X within hours. Fans, professional players such as DRX｜KNEE, and industry figures like MarkMan have shared tributes, recounting personal stories of how Tekken shaped their lives. The official @TEKKEN_Project account also responded, outlining Harada’s retirement and reaffirming the franchise’s ongoing development.

Harada’s departure represents a pivotal moment for the fighting game genre. His candid engagement with the community, including addressing fan concerns on social media, has been a hallmark of his leadership. This transition underscores a shift in Tekken’s direction, with the franchise now poised to build on his legacy under new leadership.

Katsuhiro Harada’s exit from Bandai Namco after 30 years is a testament to his enduring influence on the Tekken series and the broader gaming landscape. As the industry bids farewell to a veteran leader, anticipation builds for his next endeavours. Fans and professionals alike await further details, while the Tekken community prepares to honour his legacy at the upcoming TWT Finals.

Share this:

Updater Beware: Installing One UI 8 Bricked My Samsung Flip6

A story by Necrolicious on 11月 21, 202511月 22, 2025.

@necroliciouseng
I saw Samsung finally launched One UI 8 here & I installed it. As soon as it was done, I found the inner screen on my Flip6 no longer worked… #Samsung #Samsungflip6 #flip6 #Samsungflip #creatorsearchinsights
♬ オリジナル楽曲 – Necrolicious ENG🇺🇲🇬🇧 – Necrolicious ENG🇺🇲🇬🇧

As the title says, installing One UI 8 on my Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 has bricked it.

You might be thinking, “One UI 8 came out a while ago—why post this now?” The answer is simple: in Japan, Samsung devices & updates arrive several months later than in the rest of the world, despite being neighbours with Samsung’s home country, Korea.

Anyway, I saw One UI 8 finally launched here & I installed it. As soon as it was done, I found the inner screen on my Flip6 no longer worked.

A bit of research revealed this is a regrettably common problem with Flip series phones after the update, though it was something I had never personally experienced before.

Suggested fixes online included holding the power & volume down buttons for 20 seconds to perform a soft reset. This actually worked; the inner screen came back on. However, the moment the screen turned off once, it was gone for good until another reset.

Through continual trial & error, I discovered that this soft reset method temporarily restored the inner, main screen about 30% of the time, but whether the screen timed out or was shut off manually, the only way to restore it again was yet another reset. The current condition is already bad enough, & I think continuously resetting the phone is probably even more harmful to the motherboard or other internal components, so I don’t want to keep doing resets constantly.

I went to one of the official Samsung stores, of which there are only two in the entire country of Japan. They informed me there was no capacity to even attempt a repair for weeks since there were no available reservation slots. Unlike America, which has numerous authorised third-party repair locations (uBreakiFix, etc.) under Galaxy Care, Japan appears to have no secondary repair options I’m aware of. There’s a slim chance Docomo can repair Samsung phones bought from them at their facilities, but since I bought mine directly from the Samsung store, that route doesn’t appear open to me. I hope that if Samsung comes across this post that, apart from not releasing updates that brick devices, their main takeaway is that they should expand their repair capacity, & possible include 3rd parties as Samsung facilities abroad have done for their customers.

So I have no choice but wait until a slot opens & hope Samsung can fix it.

In the meantime, I’m stuck using only the cover screen.

This means, unfortunately, you can expect content delays. I used my Flip6 for everything—writing scripts, recording & editing my videos. I can try filming on a secondary device like my DJI Pocket 3, but that removes the makeshift teleprompter features the Flip6 main display previously gave me.

This has been an incredibly frustrating experience, but there are no real alternatives except waiting for Samsung to sort it out.

Apologies to everyone for any inconvenience.

In closing, I just want to caution everyone who also has a Samsung Flip6, or any of the Flip series, to think twice & definitely back up your data before attempting to install One UI 8.

Share this: